<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Hozzászólás: Még mindig őrült</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lightchronicler.com/hu/blog/2010/03/still-crazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lightchronicler.com/hu/blog/2010/03/still-crazy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:40:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Szerző: Romain</title>
		<link>http://www.lightchronicler.com/hu/blog/2010/03/still-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Romain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightchronicler.com/?p=1135#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>Of course, the context (position, study of lights, of the subject) and the momentum (emotion, sight...) are for 80% of the picture, but I am quite &quot;satisfied&quot; of my choices.

The problem is more on the picture quality. I come back from the Barswingona. Here is my feedback :
- Without a flash, pictures are bad (moves, lack of light, poor colors, not sharp at all...)
- With the integrated flash, it is much better (mainly up to 4 meters), but, it is a &quot;dot flash&quot; (center over-exposed), and I&#039;am seriously wondering if a SB900 (well used !) could bring more possibilities (eg. integrated flash + SB900 remote controled to play with the lights &amp; shadows, the reflects in the eyes).
- Currently, I have to tune together the flash intensity, the ISO, the WB, the speed each time the subject is moving or when I zoom. Very boring !!
- Very boring when you take a picture at a good moment, but just after, a better scene is happening... while the flash is charging ! ;-)
- under 2.8 of apperture (I&#039;ve tried a 50mm 1.8 !), the focus zone is too narrow (even if the brightness is impressive !)
- I&#039;ve not tuned my camera to save raw data (huge error, especially to work with the blacks)
- I have also read that a star filter could sharpen the center of the photo... is it true ? (you use it !)

I Will take some pictures of west coast swing by end of May... 

Thank you again for having proved to me that it is possible to take wonderful dance pictures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the context (position, study of lights, of the subject) and the momentum (emotion, sight&#8230;) are for 80% of the picture, but I am quite &#8220;satisfied&#8221; of my choices.</p>
<p>The problem is more on the picture quality. I come back from the Barswingona. Here is my feedback :<br />
- Without a flash, pictures are bad (moves, lack of light, poor colors, not sharp at all&#8230;)<br />
- With the integrated flash, it is much better (mainly up to 4 meters), but, it is a &#8220;dot flash&#8221; (center over-exposed), and I&#8217;am seriously wondering if a SB900 (well used !) could bring more possibilities (eg. integrated flash + SB900 remote controled to play with the lights &amp; shadows, the reflects in the eyes).<br />
- Currently, I have to tune together the flash intensity, the ISO, the WB, the speed each time the subject is moving or when I zoom. Very boring !!<br />
- Very boring when you take a picture at a good moment, but just after, a better scene is happening&#8230; while the flash is charging ! ;-)<br />
- under 2.8 of apperture (I&#8217;ve tried a 50mm 1.8 !), the focus zone is too narrow (even if the brightness is impressive !)<br />
- I&#8217;ve not tuned my camera to save raw data (huge error, especially to work with the blacks)<br />
- I have also read that a star filter could sharpen the center of the photo&#8230; is it true ? (you use it !)</p>
<p>I Will take some pictures of west coast swing by end of May&#8230; </p>
<p>Thank you again for having proved to me that it is possible to take wonderful dance pictures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Szerző: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.lightchronicler.com/hu/blog/2010/03/still-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-2585</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightchronicler.com/?p=1135#comment-2585</guid>
		<description>Thx for the nice feedback.

I&#039;m not laughing - equipment is only a part - it won&#039;t help in timing for example. You can make good pictures with any equipment!

I use full-frame camera. Most pictures has some sharpening utilized. Speed is usually around 1/30-1/250. Lens start from 2.8 :) You can check the exif data of the pictures for more precise info.

However focus on the emotions and timing, not just on equipment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for the nice feedback.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not laughing &#8211; equipment is only a part &#8211; it won&#8217;t help in timing for example. You can make good pictures with any equipment!</p>
<p>I use full-frame camera. Most pictures has some sharpening utilized. Speed is usually around 1/30-1/250. Lens start from 2.8 :) You can check the exif data of the pictures for more precise info.</p>
<p>However focus on the emotions and timing, not just on equipment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Szerző: Romain</title>
		<link>http://www.lightchronicler.com/hu/blog/2010/03/still-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Romain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightchronicler.com/?p=1135#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>These photos are wonderful !

The timing is exceptional (and so hard to grab in social dance), the expressions on the faces are full of emotions. These photos make me dream !

I would like to take photos myself (especially to update wikipedia, that has very few social dance photos...), but (don&#039;t laugh) I only have a D300 with a 18-200, I will go to the Barswingona... let wait and see !

Technical questions : do you have a Full Frame captor ? The noise is very low and the sharpness of the details are very impressive : it seems that you have increased the contrast ! Which speed do you use (around 1/100 it seems...) ? But I guess the last detail that will really kill me, is the aperture of your objective : around 2.8 I suppose !
As I said, I will never make such marvelous photos, however, I will try to do my best !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These photos are wonderful !</p>
<p>The timing is exceptional (and so hard to grab in social dance), the expressions on the faces are full of emotions. These photos make me dream !</p>
<p>I would like to take photos myself (especially to update wikipedia, that has very few social dance photos&#8230;), but (don&#8217;t laugh) I only have a D300 with a 18-200, I will go to the Barswingona&#8230; let wait and see !</p>
<p>Technical questions : do you have a Full Frame captor ? The noise is very low and the sharpness of the details are very impressive : it seems that you have increased the contrast ! Which speed do you use (around 1/100 it seems&#8230;) ? But I guess the last detail that will really kill me, is the aperture of your objective : around 2.8 I suppose !<br />
As I said, I will never make such marvelous photos, however, I will try to do my best !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

